Interconception Care for Adolescent Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Interconception care (ICC) is a means of improving health outcomes for women and children by mitigating maternal risks between pregnancies. Within a pediatric medical home ICC is reliant on adherence to well-child visits (WCVs). We hypothesized that a pediatric-based ICC model would remain successful in providing access to services for adolescent women for those seen during the COVID19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to determine if the COVID19 pandemic influenced LARC use and repeat pregnancy for those seen for ICC in a dyadic pediatric medical home. METHODS: The pre-COVID cohort was comprised of adolescent women seen for ICC from September 2018-October 2019. The COVID cohort was comprised of adolescent women seen for ICC from March 2020-March 2021. The two cohorts were compared across multiple characteristics including sociodemographic factors, age, education, number of visits, contraceptive choice and repeat pregnancy during the study interval. RESULTS: The COVID cohort were significantly more likely to be primiparous, seen with a younger infant, and attend fewer visits than the pre-COVID cohort. The COVID cohort were equally likely to initiate long-acting reversible contraception but less likely to experience a repeat pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID19 pandemic limited access to routine healthcare and likely impacted access to ICC for many women. ICC provided during WCVs allowed access to care even amid the restrictions of the COVID19 pandemic. Both effective contraception and decreased repeat pregnancy were maintained, highlighting the effectiveness of this approach for ICC within a dyadic pediatric medical home.

Patient perspectives of telehealth for fertility care: a national survey.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient satisfaction using telehealth for fertility care. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey using the validated telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ) distributed nationally via fertility advocacy groups of fertility patients aged ≥ 18 years with self-reported use of telehealth for care. Patient satisfaction of telehealth for fertility care as determined by the TUQ questionnaire. The survey also included questions about telehealth related to usefulness, ease of use, effectiveness, reliability, and the option for patients to add open-ended comments related to their experiences using telehealth for fertility care. RESULTS: A total of 81 fertility patients completed the survey. Patients reported high rates of satisfaction (81.4%) with telehealth in areas of usefulness, ease of use, effectiveness, reliability, and satisfaction. However, many patients (60.5%) expressed a preference for in-person visits for their initial visit while the acceptability of telehealth increased for follow-up visits. Negative themes from respondent comments address that telehealth visits felt more impersonal and rushed. CONCLUSION: Fertility patients reported high satisfaction using telehealth for care. Patients still preferred in-person visits for initial consultations. For follow-up visits, most respondents favored telehealth or had no preference. Incorporation of telehealth in fertility practices should continue though it may be helpful for patients to be given options for visit types.

Adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies affected by severe COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: Severe COVID-19 infection in pregnancy has been associated with an increase in adverse perinatal outcomes, although studies differ regarding which outcomes are affected. Increased characterization of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes is needed, including details on indications for preterm delivery and additional neonatal adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether there is a higher rate of adverse perinatal outcomes with severe-to-critical COVID-19 infection compared with nonsevere COVID-19 diagnosed during pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational cohort study that compared rates of adverse perinatal outcomes between patients with severe-to-critical and those with nonsevere (asymptomatic, mild, or moderate) COVID-19 infection. Patients had singleton pregnancies and a positive laboratory polymerase chain reaction result for COVID-19. Primary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Additional neonatal outcomes analyzed included need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, low birthweight (<2500 g), 1- or 5-minute Apgar score <7, need for supplemental oxygen, need for intubation, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, blood transfusion, necrotizing enterocolitis, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, birth trauma, or neonatal death. Appropriate bivariate analyses were used to compare groups. Logistic regression was used to examine primary outcomes while adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 441 participants were identified and confirmed via detailed chart review to be pregnant with a singleton pregnancy while diagnosed with COVID-19. Of these, 44 (10%) met National Institutes of Health criteria for severe-to-critical COVID-19 infection. The median gestational age at the time of maternal COVID-19 diagnosis was 36.4 weeks (interquartile range, 29.6-38.6). Severe-to-critical COVID-19 infection had a higher risk of a composite adverse neonatal outcome (36.4% vs 21.4%; P=.03). There was a high incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy overall (20.6%), but this outcome was not higher in the severe-to-critical vs nonsevere group. There were no maternal deaths. There was a low incidence of neonatal COVID-19 test positivity among those tested (1.8%). When adjusting for presence of heart disease and gestational age at COVID-19 diagnosis, severe-to-critical COVID-19 was strongly associated with fetal growth restriction (adjusted odds ratio, 2.73; confidence interval, 1.03-7.25) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 3.50; confidence interval, 1.56-7.87). Preterm delivery was more common but was no longer significant after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio, 2.23; confidence interval, 0.99-5.05). CONCLUSION: Severe-to-critical COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is associated with higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes and strongly associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission and fetal growth restriction compared with nonsevere disease. There is a high rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy overall in all those affected by COVID-19, regardless of severity. Pregnant persons should be counseled on these risks to encourage vaccination, and those with infection during pregnancy should be monitored for fetal growth disorders.